Total Pageviews

Monday, June 28, 2021

Early Pointers On First Drone-Attack Inside India; The Kashmiri Panj Pyarees (Five Musketeers) Who Frittered Away India's Gains At Shimla In 1972; Plus Construction Updates At Ormara

Probable Directions of HexaCopters' Flight-Paths

Here is what one can infer about the drone-strike conducted in the early pre-dawn hours of June 27, 2021 against the Indian Air Force’s Jammu AFS:

1) The drones used were in all likelihood China-made DJI Matrice 600 Pro Hexacopters that can be remote-controlled out till a maximum distance of 5km (Specifications: https://www.dji.com/matrice600-pro/info).

2) All previous instances of the usage of such HexaCopters for ferrying in weapons across the Working Boundary (WB) had made use of the DJI Matrice 600 Pro. Those that were recovered up to 12km inside India in all probability suffered from loss of remote-control data-linking and consequently drifted further inland.

3) Since the two DJI Matrice 600 Pro drones were not shot down on June 27, it can only mean that they were safely recovered by their controllers.

4) Consequently, we can thus infer that these two HexaCopters were launched within a distance of 5km from Jammu AFS and from an easterly direction that afforded the controllers an unrestricted view of the targetted area.

5) This in turn leads us to the terraces of those buildings that were sufficiently tall to offer such a view, since the areas to the west of the airport/air base is flat agrarian terrain.

6) The attack thus came from an easterly direction and not from across the WB, i.e. Pakistan-controlled territory cannot be the launch-pad for the two HexaCopters.

7) However, it is highly likely that the drone-attacks were staged by cadres of the PoK-based and Pakistan-funded Resistance Front (successor of the United Jihad Council), since Pakistan wants to give the impression that the unrests inside J & K UT are a totally indigenous affair. 8) If that is the case, then that leaves us with only three possibilities regarding the source of the HexaCopters:

A) either they were smuggled overland into Jammu from across the riverine terrain prevailing along the WB.

B) They were smuggled by an infiltration team that sneaked into Jammu via underground tunnels dug beneath the fenced-up WB.

C) The HexaCopters were ordered from and received in India under the guise of ‘agricultural spray drones’.

The riddle will be resolved only if the two HexaCopters are either recovered intact or are shot down in future during another round of attacks. For only these will reveal the identity of their operators and their financial sponsors. As for the shaped-charge IEDs used, only a well-trained person can fabricate them and this then rules out the involvement of any J & K-based operative. Instead, the IED-maker is most probably from Pakistan who has infiltrated into Jammu.

If it is true that in addition to the two back-to-back explosions, which occurred at 1.37am and 1.42am, there were two additional drones—one launched from Ratnuchak (north of Jammu AFS) and another from Kaluchak (to the southeast)—that were shot at from the ground and therefore they had to withdraw without dropping their IEDs, then this could only mean that the controllers of those drones could hear the sounds of groundfire (not possible if the controllers were Pakistan-based) and consequently the controllers were within the urban areas of Jammu and they wanted to prevent any physical damage to the drones, probably for the sake of using them again in future.

Which then brings us to the future targets, i.e. where will the next air-strike probably take place. Targets like the IAF’s air bases in Pathankot, Udhampur and Avantipora can easily be ruled out since there are no high-rise structures around such air bases and hence the controllers will not be able to visually acquire their targets at nighttime when operating from atop such structures. That leaves us with only one mouth-watering target: the heliport at Nagrota, which can be attacked in the same manner as that conducted against Jammu AFS.

So what are the soft-kill and hard-kill options available for defending such vulnerable air bases and heliports? China, for instance, has developed a truck-mounted ESM sensor that in essence uses radar warning receivers (RWR) originally developed for application on-board combat aircraft.

India can come up with a similar solution by making use of the DARE-developed Dhruti R-118 RWRs.

There are also indigenously-developed counter-drone systems, like Tonbo Imaging's VAULT C-UAS. If imported solutions are sought, then the Drone-Dome from RAFAEL of Israel is available. According to RAFAEL’s specifications, the Drone-Dome can detect micro-drones as small as 0.002 m² (3.1 square inches) at a distance of 3.5km and can sense and then jam signals between the drone and its remote control station.

https://www.rafael.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Drone-Dome.pdf

Backgrounder: Infiltrations By HexaCopters

The usage of HexaCopters began in 2019 following the Khalistan Zindabad Force’s (KZF) Pakistan-based chief Ranjeet Singh alias Neeta and his Germany-based associate Gurmeet Singh alias Bagga conducting nearly a dozen supply sorties. On March 11, 2019 the BSF shot down a HexaCopter in the Fazilka sector. Similarly, on September 19, two AK-47 SLRs, two pistols and four grenades were recovered from three arrested militants in J & K UT who claimed that arms and ammunition were received via drones. One drone was recovered on August 13, 2019 and it was a crashed HexaCopter carrying 21kg payload in Mohawa village of Amritsar district—a mere 1.5km from the IB. The drone model U10 KV100-U, and it had been designed and manufactured by China-based T Motors. The airframe of the drone was called TAROT 680 PRO. Four brick-sized batteries (model Tattu-Made in China) were also found installed in the Hexacopter. Another HexaCopter (out of three) was seized in the burnt condition in September from Jhabal town in Tarn Taran. They were used for ferrying in five AK-47s (along with 16 magazines and 472 rounds of ammunition), four China-made .30 bore ‘Star’ Pistols (along with eight magazines and 72 rounds of ammunition), nine hand-grenades, five Thuraya satellite phones along with their ancillary equipment, two cellphones, two wireless sets and FICN with face-value of Rs.10 lakh—all of which were air-dropped in Rajoke. Between September 9 and 16, 2019 HexaCopters were used for ferrying almost 100kg of arms and ammunition into Punjab. The foreign handlers, Gurmeet Bagga of Khalistan Zindabad Force (KZF), and his terrorist associates based in Pakistan, including KZF chief Ranjeet Singh Neeta, who were handling the Indian Punjab-based Akashdeep terror module, had informed Akashdeep and his associates about the crashing of this drone inside Indian territory. They had also shared the coordinates of the crash landing site and further directed Akashdeep to go to the crash site and destroy the drone by burning lest the Punjab Police came to know about it.

On September 22, 2019, the Punjab State Police successfully wound-up the India-based module of this operation, which was active in the Husseiniwallah, Tarn Taran, Ajnala, Fazilka and Khem Karan areas of Punjab. The HexaCopters with 10kg payloads had been flown for almost 7km from their launch-pads at a height of 2,000 feet to deliver their payloads. On both October 7 and 8, 2019 a HexaCopter originating from Pakistan was detected flying over two villages in the Hussainiwala area of Punjab. On October 10, 2019, HexaCopters were cited in two locations in Punjab. The first sighting was reported in Hazarasingh Wala village at 7:20am and later in Tendiwala village at 10:10pm. On January 27, 2020, a HexaCopter flown from Pakistan was shot down by the BSF in Arnia sector, while on June 20, 2020, BSF troops shot down a HexaCopter carrying one M-4 carbine, two loaded magazines (60 rounds), and seven China-irigin hand-grenades near the WB in Jammu’s Kathua district. The HexaCopter was spotted hovering in the vicinity of BoP Pansar around 5.10am by a BSF patrol party, which then shot it down 250 metres inside Indian territory.

One of the major India-based narco-terrorism modules, headed by former IA Naik Rahul Chauhan, was involved in carting 75kg of pure heroin and at least seven pistols between November and December 2019. The module, operating from the Jat Regiment Centre in Uttar Pradesh’s Bareilly, was busted on January 9, 2020. According to Chauhan’s interrogation report, a Pakistani national named Waqar got in touch with him when he was running surveillance drones for the IA in the Naushera sector in July-August 2019. Chauhan was later contacted by another source, identified as Choudhary, over a WhatsApp call from a Germany-based number, and a meeting was set up with Choudhary’s associate in Ambala. During interrogation, Chauhan admitted to operating drones from the border villages of Dhanoa Khurd and Mulaekot to pick up heroin and pistols from Pakistan. He used three drones purchased from Chandini Chowk (Delhi), Ghaziabad and Pune, and made cross-border sorties at the height of 1,200 feet on November 27 and 30, and then on December 8, 9 and 17, 2019. These sorties were made from border villages between 3am and 4am to avoid detection, and the distance covered from the launch area to the pick-up point in Pakistan was between 2.2km and 2.8km, with flying times generally between 14 and 18 minutes. Data gathered from the captured drones showed that the last flight on December 19 was 26 minutes, 54 seconds long. Further investigation revealed that the money used to buy the drones was provided by convicted drug smuggler Lakhwinder Singh (in Amristar Jail since September 2019), and his associates Ajaypal and Dharminder.

On May 14, 2021 the BSF had detected weapons dropped by a suspected Pakistan drone at Samba in Jammu. On specific information regarding dropping of arms and ammunition, BSF troops carried out a search operation in Samba sector and recovered an item wrapped in yellow polythene from a field. One AK-47 assault rifle, one pistol, one magazine, 15 rounds for a 9mm weapon, one wooden frame (used to attach the payload to the drone) and wrapping material were recovered approximately 250 metres inside Indian territory. On June 20, 2020 the BSF even shot down one such HexaCopter that was carrying arms and ammunition at Rathua village in Kathua district’s Hiranagar sector. A BSF patrol party from Pansar border outpost (BOP) had noticed this HexaCopter flying at a height of 200 feet from Pakistan towards the Indian side at around 5.10am. The drone fell nearly 250 metres on the Indian side of the border after the BSF party fired several rounds at it. Fitted with four batteries, a radio signal receiver and two GPS devices, it was 8 feet x 6.2 feet in size and weighed 18kg. The drone was carrying a payload of nearly 5kg, including a US-made M4 semi-automatic carbine, two magazines, 60 rounds and seven China-made hand-grenades. The payload marked with the name of one Ali Bhai, who BSF suspected, must have been present within 1.5km from the spot to receive the consignment.

Saga Of The Panj Pyarees (Five Musketeers)

I am uploading again details about this incident due to incessant public demand.

Construction Updates At Ormara, Pakistan
Submarine Rebuild Facility For S-26 & S-30 SSKs
New UAV Air Base
1st Type 054AP FFG of Pakistan Navy

36 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank god, since those HexaCopters could not be recovered, and that paki IED expert is missing. GoI can now safely look the other way around with the conclusions you have provided. A BIG RELIEF.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

DASHU: Luck may still side with the NIA, since mistakes & miscalculations do happen & if the chaps are headed back to the Valley up north, then they are likely to pass through the famous Bann Toll Plaza where twice earlier such chaps were intercepted & shot dead. Will history repeat itself again? Only time will tell.

Uyghurs Who Fled China Facing Repression in Pakistan:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrplLEQQMnE

Theatre Command Debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkHYyEQVztE

Strangely, no one from the IA, IN & IAF prefers to talk about the operation that got totally screwed-up due to lack of theaterisation, i.e. OPERATION PAWAN from 1987 till 1990. A critical analysis of this operation will produce all the conclusions for the successful creation of theatre commands. However, for this to happen, a tri-services national wargaming & simulation centre needs to be created where OP PAWAN can be replayed again & again to find out the flaws & shortcomings. But this centre needs to be part of the Indian National Defence University (INDU), which has been unable to take off since May 2013. And no one from officialdom seems interested in it.

Tibet's First Electrified Train to Nyingchi from Lhasa:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWL72Jac7W8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7qoKlxk6fE

BASC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RiSp772T5c

Proves beyond any doubt that Beijing's space applications programmes are all militarised.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

Galwan Valley One Year On: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWo_l_9ph-8

Russia’s Altius UCAS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKv1F0Wl3hs

UFO over Junagadh & Jamnagar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FL_hZtzsyOQ

nag said...

Dada what's the significance of the latest Agni1 prime test. Agni one has been tested many times. Nuclear missiles are better to have long range then what is the need for such short range missile. Launching short-range blastic missile with conventional payload can always be misunderstood as nuclear attack isn't

Hardik Thanki said...

Hi Prasunji,

What is the anti drone technology that is currently mass deployed around the world?

How fast can DRDO anti drone technology come online?

Thanks & Regards

Hardik Thanki

VJ said...

Dada,

Do you find any link between drone bombing on IAF station and blast in front of saeed's house? Is it a kind of retaliation from paki based terrorist?
And what options do the IAF have?

Ashish Gautam said...

hello sir, how are u doing these days?
as u told regarding probable drone used that has a max range of 5kms. my question is that, is it possible that they used some other drone which may have pre programmed flying feature which has flown from across the border dropped its package on pre selected target & went back to its home???
2) was this just a target practice op before any big swarm type strike coming? or even validation of conducting such attacks on our AD systems in war scenario which may damage AD capability to some good extent?
Not a question but just my u can say feling that GOI will not allow force's to do anything like Balakot this time. but yes UP election k nazdeek say in feb or march next year they may do something serious. Might use navy this time. Let's see....

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To NAG: Just as China is replacing its DF-11 & DF-15 TBMs with the DF-16, India too has to procure newer-generation BMs to replace the much older BMs like Agni-1 & Agni-2 & hence the Agni Prime has been developed as a cannister-encased BM. One can also see the various apertures in the warhead section for the terminal guidance sensors (missing on Agni-1). Here is the Hi-Rez image:

https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/userfiles/image/PIC(1)WH0D.jpg

To HARDIK THANKI: I had already explained it all in the previous thread on June 28, 2021 at 4:08 AM. The DRDO solution is a soft-kill system that relies on jammers & was used on January 26 this year.

To VJ: Pakistan’s ISI knows very well that the Lahore bombing was done by Afghanistan’s NDS. Here's the explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BF812ge6Ks&t=76s

The attacks with HexaCopters was a J & K-specific operation & is likely to have involved at least 6 months of planning & logistics-support.

Rajesh Mishra said...

Will India react to it now and if yes then in which manner???

just_curious said...

Prasun,

1 Even NDS has a good reach in Pakistan.. could the Lahore bombing .. what limits us??
2 India currently has 2800-3000 BMP2 but the RFi is only for 1750.. what about the rest?
3 recent drone attack reports mention drone guided by GPS.. why is it only GPS being used inclusing in all major attacks like pulwama, mumbai etc.. by not Baidou when they know they will get caught as US will certianly share information and join in the investigations
4 You may replied to this but how diff is the latest T90 provy 3 to the lastest T90 S india has? Is there a need to opt for the Provy in the future or upgrade to that std?

Pratap said...

Sir, a drone attack like this regardless of intensity and damage it caused is a serious climb up of the escalation ladder. A couple of missiles must land in Muzaffarabad or Skardu in response to what's happened. The enemy would feel emboldened if we do not act and could lead to a situation in the future where drone attacks would become normal like encounters and infiltration from POK.

Anonymous said...

Drone came from Pak & went back to Pak. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pak-let-behind-drone-attack-in-jammu-target-was-atc-and-parked-iaf-helicopters-101624857978136.html

Isnt this act of war?

AMAN

asd said...

Dear Prasun,

India has moved around 50000 soldiers to Ladakh. Is anything cooking?

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To ASHISH GAUTAM & PRATAP: 1) I have already uploaded additional data with supporting slides that proves this strike originated from within Jammu City itself. That’s why there were 2 other drones that could not press home their attacks. So, in peacetime autonomous drones cannot be used, but they definitely can during wartime. I have even predicted above where the next such air-attack will take place. 2) A total of 4 drones—most likely HexaCopters—were used, meaning 4 different controllers were operating the hand-held control-stations. That is why it is of utmost importance to recover those drones as that will reveal exactly how such drones were procured, i.e. whether they were smuggled in across the IB/WB/LoC or whether they were ordered online & delivered inside India by regular courier services. Only this will reveal whether or not Pakistan had a direct role.

To RAJESH MISHRA: Lot’s of morons appearing on Indian TV talk-shows & spreading unnecessary fear & panic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljqcZXNeZho&t=12s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA5P_p-ExU8&t=4s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s1BpfKmYXE&t=17s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEMGYhwaX2I&t=15s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MIvs4us-Q&t=28s

As I have explained above, Pakistan cannot be attacked unless there’s compelling documentary evidence about its involvement as a financier & facilitator. As for defensive solutions, I have already highlighted them above. Perhaps after browsing through this thread, most of the ‘desi’ English-language TV channels too are realising that the drones did not fly in from Pakistan after all.

To AMAN: That is the only ‘desi’ news-reporter who’s claiming this to be the case, when even Indian security agencies have now ruled it out.

To ASD: Routine rotations of the IA’s formations.

To JUST_CURIOUS: 1) Why attack Lahore? Why can’t India conduct such attacks anywhere within PoJK at will? After all, if PoJK is integral Indian territory, then why not treat it as one & conduct counter-terror operations throughout PoJK? 2) The 2,800 figure includes various support-vehicles, like ambulances, CBRN detection vehicle, armoured recovery vehicles, mortar carriers, etc etc. 3) Even usage of GPS navigation involves transmission of signals for the sake of receiving the updates & hence for a covert strike that has to remain undetected, no form of RF emission should take place. If truly silent, RF emission-free navigation is to take place, then fibre-optic gyro is the only solution for autonomous one-way or two-way flight. Since the drones used yesterday were not shot down, they were successfully recovered by their controllers for future use (including two that were fired upon & hence had to abort their mission), it means that such drones were not autonomous in flight, but were being controlled from hand-held remote-control stations. 4) The T-90 Provy, unlike the T-90S, incorporates a lot of the features that were originally developed for the T-14 Armata MBT.

Kaustav said...

Prasunda

I might certainly be wrong but the long range missile tested yesterday is no replacement for the Agni 1. That was tested a few years ago & is like the Shaurya.

Whatever was tested yesterday, the size of the first stage/motor, the design, the truck it has been launched from show clearly that it is either experimental or deployed version of Agni3 or Agni5. If a two stage misdile, it's probably an all composite cannisterised Agni3, if more then an Agni5. The Agni Prime designation is usually for newer versions/designs. The Agni4 was also Agni2 Prime before being labelled as Agni4.

ShivKurup said...

Prasunji,

1) Are anti tank trenches still effective at slowing down tanks IF the attacking tanks lack vehicle launched bridges or other engineering equipment? (Just a hypothetical question)

2) How long and deep must anti tank trenches be to stop modern western tanks like abrams? (Again if they lack equipment to bridge the trench in any way)

3) If all our T-90 tanks are the S variant, which is the oldest variant, dont they fall behind the likes of VT-4?

4) Have we any plans of acquiring or upgrading our T-90 tanks to the MS variant or atleast the M variant?

5) Are Igla Manpads effective at stopping WingLoong/Bayraktar size drones?

6) Why was armenia which was in possession of relatively decent air defense missiles completely overwhelmed by these drones?

7) How many ballistic missile launchers does/can china have aimed against india in the event of a conflict in ladakh?

8) What kind of damage can they do to our forward operating bases along LAC? How long can they put our airbases/runways out of action?

9) Russia recently re-activated a few soviet era t-62 tanks to donate to Syria. How long can old tanks be kept in storage and still be reactivated before environmental conditions degrade them to beyond repair? Do they require special containers?

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To KAUSTAV: Externally it looks like the Agni-3 or Agni-5 due to its greater diameter. It is indeed a two-stage BM but incorporates several new features originally developed for the Agno-5, like all-composite fuel tanks, terminal SAR seekers, etc etc. But most importantly, being cannister-encased, it enables quicker deployment & the launch preparation procedures are greatly simplified. In fact, I won't be surprised at all if it eventually emerges that this BM was the result of all improvements & enhancements that have come out of the SLBM R & D programmes.

To SHIVKURUP: 1 & 2) Combat engineering equipment always accompany every mechanised/armoured formations & are integral assets for such formations & hence anti-tank trenches can easily be bridged with Sarvatra-type multi-span bridging systems whose length can gop up to 200 metres. 3) Oldest & latest variants are the same: T-90S. 4) Had already given you the weblinks containing slides of the MBT upgrade projects. 5) Yes. 6) Because those air-defence systems were employed in the wrong manner & against the wrong weapons operated by Azerbaijan. 7) About 250. 8) They can't, because to knock out a single air base, more than 60 BMs will be reqd. 9) It all depends on how nicely they are stored inside warehouses & how they are refurbished before delivery.

Technology, Photograpy and Travel said...

Dada,

Can you please enlighten with some write up of the energy requirements for the EMP. weapons and the duration and also how it has no effect when trying to target some thing one move in the sea with BM which has a emp weapon

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

Logistics-related expenditure in 2020 alone had seen around a 46% jump from the allocated amount for 2020-2021 for the entire Northern Command area. Logistics-related expenditure such as transportation, stores, works and other miscellaneous expenditure in Ladakh and Jammu & Kashmir went up by around 85% when compared with the estimates of 2019. The transit facilities along both the axes—the Jammu-Srinagar-Zoji La axis and the Manali-Rohtang-Leh axis—to reach Leh or Ladakh as well as the transit camps along them are being upgraded to accommodate additional troops and vehicles. Eight new bridges have been built in Ladakh alone to cater to the operational logistics of the thousands of troops deployed just at the forward posts near LAC. On June 28, 2021, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh inaugurated the Kyungam Bridge—part of 63 infrastructure projects constructed by the Border Roads Organisation (BRO)—which has been built on the Indus River on the Leh-Loma axis. The bridge will improve connectivity to southern Ladakh and will aid in additional flexibility to the deployment of troops along the LAC by allowing a faster switching of their locations. A total of 11 bridges were inaugurated in Ladakh alone. Close to 50,000 ALS loads and CHT (civil hired transport) trucks are being pressed into service to transport 150 lakh tonnes of ration and 1 lakh kilo litres of kerosene oil. Additional water storage capacity is being created for the troops and there will be an enhanced helicopter effort for maintenance of isolated posts. Additional funds will be allocated for porters and ponies. Special fuel oil and lubricants are being procured and inducted. Additional spares for a large number of mechanised vehicles and weapon systems are being procured. The Army has projected an enhanced annual requirement of 17 types of special clothing and mountaineering equipment for troops deployed in extreme high altitude areas. Large procurement of habitat for the troops, such as 300 to 500 fibreglass huts, 1,000-1,200 living and store shelters and 250-300 specialised tentage are ongoing. Close to 10,000 sets of special clothing and boots, and 35,000 sets of extreme cold weather clothing are also being procured. 1,000 living shelters and about 2,000 fibre-glass huts of different sizes are the total requirement for the sustenance of the troops in that region, some of which were transported last year. The turnover of troops also requires a large number of vehicles, which need to be incorporated into planning. Every year at least six to eight units of 14 corps are turned over as part of the field-peace profile. With an increased deployment in Ladakh, this figure will also go up. Each unit requires approximately 60 ALS for its move, so 500 vehicles will be required for turnover of the troops deployed. From May 1 to October 31, there are 184 days, of which 150 days to 160 days are available for the move of vehicles. The turnaround time is approximately six days thereby there is a requirement of close to 300 vehicles per day to be pressed into service.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To TECHNOLOGY, PHOTOGRAPHY & TRAVEL: This should suffice:

https://idsa.in/idsacomments/emp-weapons-new-equation-of-war_apant_131017

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

India has an estimated over 600,000 rogue or unregulated unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and security agencies are analysing modern anti-drone weapons like ‘sky fence’ and ‘drone gun’ to counter terror or similar sabotage bids by these aerial platforms. Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPRD) and the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MCA) appointed task forces are now mulling on “priority areas that need to be armed with counter-drone weapons and the cost estimation to procure suitable gadgets.

https://www.zentechnologies.com/zads-zen-anti-drone-counter-drone-system.php

https://www.smart-shooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SMASH-2000-V6.12.20.pdf

https://downloads.aaronia.com/datasheets/solutions/drone_detection/Aaronia_AARTOS_DDS_FAQ.pdf

https://downloads.aaronia.com/datasheets/solutions/jammers/Aaronia_CMS_Sector_Jammers.pdf

https://downloads.aaronia.com/datasheets/solutions/jammers/Aaronia_CMS_Mini_UAV_Jammer.pdf

https://downloads.aaronia.com/datasheets/solutions/jammers/Aaronia_CMS_Backpack_Jammer.pdf

https://openworksengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SkyWall-Safer-Airspace-Brochure.pdf

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To ASD: These probably had raised your concerns:

https://www.business-standard.com/article/politics/a-year-after-galwan-india-and-china-still-face-off-in-ladakh-121061500753_1.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fR__H7VmuqQ

The figures he has quoted are WRONG. He has also gotten mixed up between 155mm rounds & 125mm rounds. Back in 1999 while the IA had imported 125mm APFSDS rounds from Israel's IMI, the 155mm rounds were imported from South Africa's DENEL Group.

In addition, ISR surveillance of the western IB/WB/LoC has been increased, as evidenced by this slide:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E48k9z0UcAUcUmi?format=jpg&name=large

But he is dead-right when he says that India’s political leadership continues to mis-read its Chinese counterparts motives & intentions & hence India continues to try placating Beijing by saying again & again that the standoff must be resolved “in accordance with the strategic guidance issued by China’s President & India’s PM”. Why India continues repeating such statements when there is no proof of China’s President sharing such a sentiment remains a mystery.

asd said...

Thanks Prasun dada.

Ranveer said...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cZXvQv96-4I

This figure of 50000 troops is being used as a propaganda when the truth is that only 50000 troops are deployed at a time since last year.
The figure of 200000 is of all troops designated for LAC from Ladakh to Arunachal Pradesh.

They can't even figure out it is rotation of troops.

AMIT BISWAS said...

https://twitter.com/NAVAIRNews/status/1410314630648545284?s=20

Whats the new element here??

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To AMIT BISWAS: Mid-Band = Ku-Band & Ka-Band. The new element is Ka-Band.

In early 2020 the PLAAF had ordered eight Mi-171Sh CSAR helicopters from Russia’s Ulan-Ude Aviation Industrial Plant, the first ever CSAR platforms of the PLAAF. Deliveries have now begun. For PLAGF, it mazy be recalled that in 1991 24 Mi-17V-1s were ordered, followed in 1996 by 60 Mi-17V-5s, 15 Mi-171s in 1999, 35 Mi-17V-5s in 2002, 25 Mi-17V-7s in 2003, 81 Mi-171Es in 2007, 32 Mi-171Es in 2010 and another 52 Mi-171Es in 2012.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BdJVi1iHg8

China has begun construction of 119 new silos for the DF-41 intercontinental-range ballistic missiles in a desert near the northwestern city of Yumen. Work is now underway at scores of sites across a grid covering hundreds of square miles of arid terrain in China’s Gansu province. Each site is separated from its neighbours by about 2 miles, and many of the sites are concealed by a large, dome-like covering, following a practice observed at known construction sites for missile silos in other parts of China. At sites where the dome is not in place, construction crews can be seen excavating a characteristic circular-shaped pit in the desert floor. Another construction site appears to be a partially built command-n-control centre.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/china-nuclear-missile-silos/2021/06/30/0fa8debc-d9c2-11eb-bb9e-70fda8c37057_story.html

Anonymous said...

1)How many nuclear capable Agni 4/5 Silos does India have?

2)Will our nuke missiles be able to penetrate multi-layered missile defence systems of China & reach Beijing?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/china-nuclear-missile-silos/2021/06/30/0fa8debc-d9c2-11eb-bb9e-70fda8c37057_story.html

-AMAN

Anonymous said...

Hi Prasun,
IK Niazi in his latest speeches has fully endorsed China and it seems Pak is fully under Chinese grip. However all their Retired Generals politicians throng western countries like UK, US and have their business interests their. What is the end game of western countries here?
Regards,
Chintan

AMIT BISWAS said...

Will IN/IAF be interested with this
https://youtu.be/nLBmrTYwS7A

Sanjeev said...

Reading news that Chinese air defence systems deployed by Pakistan are having serviceability issues. Any truth in these reports?

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

Xi Jinping’s Speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYUmztqXEjI&t=30s

Decoding Xi Jinping’s Speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEyQrn-3P9Q&t=11s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lh4gESxMHRM&t=5s

China Defector Said Virus Was Part of BioWeapon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWVmXet4M1U

Sichuan-Tibet Railway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDdG7ObinG4

Vijay Gokhale: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFNtdMykMDs

Kanti Bajpai: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMCwtFDWaRo

Smokeless War: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jc1LB-rzi1Y

Upheaval in Tibet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymlu6CoI_sQ

China’s Cyber Espionage Activities:

https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/summit/cds-2019/presentations/cds19-executive-s08-achievement-unlocked.pdf

US-Pakistan Relations In Future: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej0ajIvuICA

German TV Documentary on Pakistan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6tdcnhY3uw

Dutch Navy in Black Sea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hMeL6OODkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo8u4xad_DQ

MLC-70 Kungyam Bridge in Ladakh: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jWO3kL8HP0

Col Chewang Rinchen (who captured Turtuk in 1971):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSnRa-cia5Y

IA COAS Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM6mdU2FQMg&t=22s

UAV Roundtable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1LOOAsrGHQ&t=14s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtuXp1qK02c

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To AMAN: 1) Those countries that possess survivable sea-based strategic deterrent or land-mobile strategic deterrent don’t need to create land-based silos for housing ICBMs. 2) Where is the evidence on the existence of a multi-layered BMD system for Beijing? What are its various layers?

To CHINTAN: That approach is resorted to by Pakistan to extract as much as possible from the West, since all that Pakistan has acquired from China is financial bankruptsy.

To AMIT BISWAS: What for? The IN has had far more advanced ASCMs & SLCMs since the year 2000 in the form of Novator 3M54E & 3M14E & is now going for the BrahMos-NG. Maybe the Sri Lanka Air Force will procure for their Kfir C-7s that are being upgraded.

And as expected, BEL was yesterday nominated for series-producing the DRDO-developed counter-drone system.

SANJEEV: Serviceability issue arise due to 2 reasons: 1) unadaptability to local operating conditions. 2) Unavailability of spares due to either stoppage of their manufacture or the prohibitive cost of procuring them. Both of these are responsible for the poor serviceability rates of Pakistan’s China-origin air-defence weapons.

Kaustav said...

Prasunda

Coincidence?! This bit of news that a South Asian country has just placed an order for Anti-drone systems to IAI, Israel! Delicious, such sweet coincidences

Ujjwal said...

Prasunda,

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/246-year-old%C2%A0ordnance-factory-board-scrapped-7-new-companies-to-take-over-269397

Want an in depth analysis of the matter in a new thread.

Thanks, regards

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To UJJWAL: What is there to analyse? . If increasing taxation is unacceptable, the defence services could monetise some of its 17 lakh acres (2,833 sq km) of defence land, which is increasingly a headache for military units and formations to safeguard. Adding annual parcels of defence land to the real estate and housing construction sectors would create the resources for a military modernisation fund, while also boosting economic activity and employment. There are, however, well-justified questions over whether such land sales could ever be kept corruption-free. Even within the military, real estate has created a chequered history of controversies involving senior generals, in land scandals such as the one in Sukhna in 2008 and the Adarsh Housing Society scam in Mumbai in 2011. That leaves the option of MoD disinvestment in the 41 factories of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB), which produce arms, ammunition and equipment for the military worth about Rs.12,000 crore annually. Given the OFs’ notoriously low productivity and quality, a Group of Ministers is already considering a proposal to “corporatise” them. Merely imposing a corporate structure, however, is unlikely to transform a jalopy into a racehorse and the MoD should consider “privatisation” instead. In the UK, selective privatisation has transformed a moribund public defence sector into vibrant and productive private entities. London has conveyed its willingness to share its experience and expertise with India. This must be explored as a means of raising both capital and productivity.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To KAUSTAV: Neither happenstance nor coincidence.

https://www.iai.co.il/drupal/sites/default/files/2021-05/ELI-4030%20Drone%20Guard%20COMJAM%20Brochure.pdf

https://www.iai.co.il/drupal/sites/default/files/2019-05/ELI-4030%20Drone%20Guard%20Brochure_0.pdf

Leading the development of assault-bridging systems is a collaborative effort by the Indian Army’s Corps of Engineers, the Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and Larsen & Toubro (L & T). On July 2, 2021, the IA inducted the first of 12 10-metre short-span bridging systems that will be deployed in the western borders shared with Pakistan by combat engineers. According to DRDO chief Dr G. Satheesh Reddy, L & T will deliver 30 more bridges by August. The Rs.492 crore contract for a total of 110 such systems was signed in 2020 and deliveries will be completed by 2023. They will be used to bridge gaps of up to 9.5 metres with a single-span (slab supported on both ends), which is four-metre-wide with a fully decked roadway, over water bodies and canals so that tanks, armoured vehicles and troops can easily move across while operating against Pakistan. The IA had a five-metre and 15-metre span bridge, but 10 metres was always needed. This will fulfil the gap and will enhance the mechanised formation’s capability and operation speed in the western front. These bridging systems are also compatible with the Sarvatra Bridging System that is 75-metres-long, where the last span requires covering gaps less than 9.5 metres. Capable of withstanding a weight of up to 70 tonnes, the 10 short-span bridging systems replace the existing AM-50 assault bridge, which had been imported from Czech Republic and could only handle 50 tonnes. As a result, the new systems mean that the 68-tonne Arjun Mk.1A MBT can also move with ease on the bridges for cross-border operations. The 10-metre short-span bridging system can be deployed in 10 minutes by a team of four personnel and a driver. It is compatible with existing bridging systems that enhances the flexibility to cover all types of waterbodies. With the latest induction, the IA has short-span bridging systems for gaps of 5 metres, 10 metres and 15 metres. The induction of the 5-metre and 15-metre bridging systems started in 2017 and both have also been manufactured by L & T. L & T has also developed new systems with composites that make it much lighter. This helps in faster deployment. The stress had been on metallurgy so that the system becomes lighter and easier to operate. In addition to these assault-bridging systems, the IA is also working on new lighter foot-bridges for mountainous terrain. Trials for these new kinds of footbridges for mountainous terrain have been completed and the process to acquire them will be completed soon. The footbridges have also been developed by the DRDO and will replace the heavier ones that the IA currently uses to help the infantry cross wet-gaps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_s1Q2vLb3M