Total Pageviews

Monday, January 27, 2020

New Weapons Showcased At RDP-2020

ADTCR of Indian Army’s ADC & RS
The ADTCR is the Army version of the Indian Air Force’s (IAF) gapfiller Ashwini LLTR.
Based on the DRDO’s proposal in January 2009, the MoD sanctioned the DRDO’s efforts to engage 13 Indian industrial partners for developing an active phased-array, S-band LLTR known as Ashwini. The IAF has indicated an initial order for 18 Ashwini LLTRs, following successful field evaluation trials (FET), against a total requirement for 67.
Low-Level Transportable Radars (LLTR) are required for surveillance against low-level intrusion of airspace up to a height of 30 metres in a range of 150km. In 1997 the Indian Air Force (IAF) HQ had projected a requirement of active phased-array LLTRs and in January 1998 had obtained ‘in-principle’ approval from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for the acquisition of 37 LLTRs. IAF HQ’s efforts to import LLTRs on four occasions (between March 1998 and February 2002) did not fructify due to the MoD-owned Defence Research & Development Organisation’s (DRDO) objections on the issue of the quantum of transfer of technology (ToT) from foreign vendors. However, for meeting the immediate requirements, the Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) in October 2005 accorded ‘Acceptance of Necessity’ (AoN) to import 19 GS-100 LLTRs from THALES of France under the ‘Buy & Make’ category along with associated industrial ToT, with the balance of 18 LLTRs to be developed by the DRDO’s Electronics R & D establishment (LRDE) under the ‘Make’category. The MoD inked two contracts in July 2009 for the procurement of 19 GS-100 LLTRs at a total cost of Rs.1,272 crore. The ‘Buy’ part of ‘Buy and Make’ contract was concluded with THALES for the procurement of six fully-furnished (FF) LLTRs along with communications and associated equipment; and knocked-down kits for 13 GS-100s along with industrial ToT at a total cost of Rs.572.20 crore, with the delivery schedule lasting from February 2012 till March 2013 (later revised to June 2015).
Advance payment of Rs.85.82 crore was also released to THALES in November 2009. The ‘Make’ part of ‘Buy and Make’ contract was concluded with the MoD-owned Bharat Electronics Ltd’s (BEL) Ghaziabad facility at a cost of Rs.699.54 crore for the licenced-assembly and supply of the 13 GS-100s between March 2013 and March 2015. An advance of Rs..160.97 crore was also paid to BEL in November 2009. However, it was only by late 2017 that all the GS-100s had been delivered to the IAF.
The Ashwini LLTR is in turn networked with the IAF’s Arudhra MPR through the IACCCS system.
Based on the Indian Air Force’s ASQR of August 2003 for an air base-located 3-D, S-band Central Acquisition Radars (CAR), the MoD in November 2003 sanctioned a Mission Mode project of the LRDE called ‘Rohini’ at a cost of Rs.34.05 crore with a PDC of 36 months (by November 2006). Subsequently, the LRDE inked a comprehensive technology transfer-cum-IPR rights buyout package with Poland’s Przemyslowly Instytut Telekominikacji SA under which the DRDO would obtain and transfer the production technology for the PIT-developed TRS-17 S-band, 3-D radar with 240km range, to BEL. However, the project sanction did not include the post-development activities such as user-trials and its acceptance by the IAF. By August 2007 the LRDE had developed the radar within the extended PDC (August 2007) with an expenditure of Rs.28.02 crore and the project was closed in August 2007.
The IAF carried out the 3-D CAR’s trials between February 2008 and March 2008 and recommended its induction into service. The project was completed by December 2010 with an extra expenditure of Rs.7.27 crore. During the course of development and trials of the ‘Rohini’, the IAF had placed two supply orders (in March 2006 and July 2009, respectively) with BEL for the manufacture and supply of 37 ‘Rohini’ 3-D CARs, while the Army has since ordered 14.
Low-Level Lightweight Radars (LLLWR) with a range of 50km that can be transported by animal carts/trucks/helicopters for deployment in difficult and high-altitude terrain. Based on the IAF’s August 2004 requirement for 36 LLLWRs and the DAC’s ‘in-principle’ approval in September 2004 for procuring 15 ELTA-supplied EL/M-2026B X-band LLLWRs through the ‘Buy’ option, with the balance 21 being acquired through indigenous development by the LRDE, the MoD in December 2004 sanctioned the development of the S-band ‘Aslesha’ LLLWR under Mission Mode at a cost of Rs.21.94 crore with a PDC of 30 months (June 2007). After user-trials were conducted between December 2009 and February 2010, the IAF in February 2010 recommended improvements in the power supply system, sensor head and the Commander’s Display Unit. The LRDE agreed to carry out the changes in production models and in September 2011 closed the project as successful with an expenditure of Rs.20.77 crore. Deliveries of these LLLWRs was delayed by 23 months and were completed in June 2015.
 
A proposal for procurement of 38 ‘Bharani Mk.2’ 3-D LLLWRs for the Indian Army under the ‘Buy Indian’ category based on a design from the LRDE was forwarded by the MoD in July 2012 to BEL for comments. The proposal was sent considering that the LRDE had already developed the L-band Bharani Mk.1 LLLWR, which was then under series-production by BEL (16 units) under a contract signed in March 2011. While the Mk.1 radar was 2-D/L band radar, the proposed Bharani Mk.2 was envisaged as a 3-D surveillance radar with better low-altitude target detection capability and improved operational and performance characteristics. In April 2013 the Board of Directors of BEL approved a proposal to develop one prototype of Bharani Mk.2 having features similar to thye IAF’s S-band Aslesha LLLWR at an estimated cost of Rs.17.36 crore, including a capital investment and offer it for evaluations and field demonstrations to the Indian Army within a timeframe of 18 months. The Board also advised BEL’s Management to sign a detailed Memorandum ofUnderstanding (MoU) with the LRDE since the latter would be the systems design agency for Bharani Mk.2. As per the timeline fixed by the Board, the Probable Date of Completion of design and development was October 2014. However, progress in the project was delayed due to finalisation of the design by the LRDE and subsequently conducting the Preliminary Design Review with the end-user and BEL.
Meanwhile, the LRDE in September 2014 informed BEL that during the Quarterly Interactive Meeting with Army Air Defence Directorate, the end-user showed keenness on S-Band and an Aslesha radar modified for meeting the Bharani Mk.2 requirements was to be fielded for user evaluations by March 2015. Due to change of the operating band, development of the L-band Bharani Mk.2 was kept on hold till November 2014, and a fresh sanction was accorded in March 2015 by the Chairman and Managing Director of BEL for the development of an S-band Bharani Mk.2 at an estimated cost of Rs.4.98 crore. An expenditure to the tune of Rs.11.45 crore was incurred on the development of the L-band Bharani Mk.2 till March 2016. As the development was put on hold, most of the above expenditure was rendered futile. Also, BEL did not adhere to the directions of the Board to sign a MoU with LRDE to ensure clarity to the project and commitment from LRDE. BEL’s Management stated in September 2016 that the LRDE being the designated design agency, had proposed Bharani Mk.2 using semi-active phased-array technology in L-band. The change in frequency band necessitated design changes. Out of the total expenditure of Rs.11.45 crore, most of the money was utilised in new development/modification/realisation of the S-band version based on Aslesha.
The DRDO, along with private sector Indian industry, has also developed upgrade packages for the existing 30 Indra-1 (GRL-600) 2-D L-band gapfiller radars of the IAF and seven Indra-2 (GRL-610) of the Indian Army, which were supplied by Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL) in the 1980s. All these radars can now function as 3-D solid-state digital radars. A similar upgrade package is now available for the IAF’s 18 PSM-33 Mk.2 L-band 3-D high-power radars (HPR) of late-1970s vintage. Meanwhile, BEL with the assistance of THALES has refurbished the nine THALES-supplied TRS-2215D S-band HPRs that had been procured since February 1984. The DRDO has already commenced work on developing an indigenously designed L-band HPR, for which a requirement of 15 units has been identified by the IAF.
In November 2002 the IAF had projected a requirement of 23 S-band active phased-array medium-power radars (MPR) for service-induction between 2007 and 2017, so that they could replace the BEL-built L-band PSM-33 Mk.1/2, P-40 and TRS-2215D radars, which had completed their service life of 29 years. Based on the IAF HQ’s ASQR of November 2004 and due to non-availability of indigenous technologies, the MoD in April 2006 approved the importing of 15 MPRs (ELTA Systems’ EL/M-2084) and the indigenous development of eight ‘Arudhra’ MPRs. FET of the Arudhra was completed in October 2018 with success. In addition, 37 ‘Rohini’ air base-located 3-D, S-band Central Acquisition Radars (CAR) have been delivered as were 21 DRDO-developed ‘Aslesha’ S-band low-level lightweight radars (LLLWR).
For ensuring gap-free air-surveillance along the mountain valleys and high-altitude passes in India’s north-west, northern and north-east regions, a total of 10  ELTA Systems-built L-band EL/M-2083 ‘Airstar’ aerostat-mounted MPRs is required to add to the two already in service, as are 15 L-band active phased-array high-power airspace surveillance radars. These new radars will be interfaced with the IAF’s existing 32 new mobile control and reporting centres (MCRC), 12 air defence control centres (ADCC), 24 air defence direction centres (ADDC) and some 40 terminal weapons control centres (TWCC) along India’s western and north-eastern borders, The 1,700kg EL/M-2083 ‘Airstar’ is mounted inside 240 feet-long aerostat that is perched at altitudes of up to 4,000 feet, use electronically-steered multi-beam techniques to detect terrain hugging airborne targets—combat aircraft, helicopters, cruise missiles and UAVs—at ranges of up to 300km, while the trajectories of ballistic missiles can be accurately plotted up to 500km away.
ASAT Missile
Short-Span Bridging System
Upgunning Elements of OFB-Built 8.4-Tonne Sharang 155mm/45-Cal Towed Howitzer
Air-Defence Systems To Be Displayed At Future RDPs

42 comments:

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

IA's GOC XV Corps explains what happened on December 27 last year:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li2p_UX3Cjs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04-u4SIs3vM

Total administrative breakdown in PoK:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p69ShmIJ_Gk
Neelum Valley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp1YBlhHCeg&t=46s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQu-h3bGwdk&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjqKoESUQ5w&t=15s

Another fatal car-crash by a US Embassy automobile in Islamabad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaBrOjC1E1w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5BSq4c7MJc

AMIT BISWAS said...

One basic doubt...how does rotating part of radar is connected to cables which are stationary...

shukant chatrath said...

Good to see DRDO has made such good progress in radar technologies but,Sir was always wondering one thing why the MoD never display more indigenously designed products in the republic day parade, its always the T-90 never the Arjun, the kestrel also never formed a part of the republic day parade???

also what is the status of the Rustom UAV and the TAPAS UAV???? They seemed to have vanished from the face of the earth.

DAshu said...

Sir, why the EU is passing those anti-India resolutions? What they want?
Heartening to see some desi made defense equipment being inducted though speed is very slow.

Do we maintain DGMO level transcriptions? If not another f-16 shooting down claim like saga will repeat after GOC's 27th Dec revelation.

@Amit Biswas - Have you ever wondered how a ceiling fan is rotating in every household?

Sanjeev said...

How many Arudhra radars have been ordered by IAF/IA and how many have been delivered so far?

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

Excellent presentation by the Royal Aeronautical Society on the crash of MH-370 in southern Indian Ocean with lots of new insights & data:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qk1CxO9XGyQ

Jaikishan said...

Prasunji,

1) Is the Seeker on the Brahmos ASCM good enough to overcome modern electronic counter measures fielded by Chinese Navy like the ones on type 055 and type 052d destroyers?

2) Is there any plan to replace or modernise the 1980s era russian Seeker on our brahmos missiles with better ones? I know we have 2 seekers under development, what is their status?

3) How does the anti ship Brahmos compare with export version of klub?

4) When will the 500km range brahmos be deployed on Indian navy surface vessels in anti ship role?

5) When will 150km range Barak ER be deployed on Indian navy ships?

6) How does the Kolkata class compare overall with the Chinese type 052d destroyer?

7) Is there any plan (or even possibility) to increase the variety of surface to air missiles on the p15a kolkata class? We only have the medium range Barak 8, but no long range missile or CIWS missiles for a multi tier system. Can't we add a Sea ram system or a ghibka ciws for some last ditch defence instead of relying on the useless AK 630s?

8) Is the mistral SAM in the simbad/tetral/sadral CIWS, and igla armed ghibka CIWS capable of shooting down sea skimming ASCMs like exocet or yj82?

9) Is the MFstar radar on kolkata class the 250km range corvette version or the 400km range frigate version?

10) Will the same radar equip the p17a nilgiri Frigates or will it be a downgraded version?

11) What improvements in weapons and electronics does the vishakhapatnam class possess over the Kolkata class?

12) When do you expect the hypersonic brahmos 2 to enter service?

Thanks

rad said...


great article on radars. The specs of the adtr radar seem to small for a aesa radar thta has a huge apertureie, 200km for 2m2 ? , i would think not , may be 400 km
when a Aesa radar of a fighter can pick up targets 200km + , then the modern radar with it huge aperture and power put[ut can do more , am misisng some thing ?
we have nmade many aesa radar now . has the niche algo for discrimination , eccm , pulling out targets from clutter been shared by all radars or a each is different .

what is this EU sanction on India ? will it go thru and how will it affect us. Now they also want us to fall inline with iran sanctions , is it a quid pro?

Time and and again france has stood by us in the most testing times and i think the sub contract should go to it to tach a lesson to other ue nations.

pakistan has done every thing under the sun and yet no sanctions on it /?
disapearing journo , balochis , shias too. run buy a dictator .

what is this new BDL IIR misile amogh 3 some thing > it looks like a javeln knock off.

has the NGARM ever been fired ?

how true is the report that the k4 has matured to to be onboared the subs ? has it been tested in secret before as reports suggest?.

why is the tender for the p75i subs so expensive at 1 bil$ persub?

as the arihant fires russian torpedoes , ow do you rate them compared to the f21 and seahake? but china has them too and surely would have developed counter measurez for them/.? can ARihant fire the upcomming sub variant of teh varunastra?. why is the varunsastra longer than any other torpedo ? more siver zinc batt? of just lower tech?

there seems to be nomention of the ground master radar from thales ? is it uses only for BMD purposes?. DOes thales share the source code for radar collaboration . or is it local assembly of parts here in india. what tech do we gain in these deals ?





Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To AMIT BISWAS: The same principle applicable to table-top & overhead fans also applies to rotating radar antennae.

To SHUKANTH CHATRATH: The Arjun Mk.1A was displayed previously during the 2014 RDP. Kestrel 8 x 8 APC has not yet entered service with the IA & not even entered the FET stage. Rustom/Tapas UAS platforms still face several developmental challenges & are still in the technology demonstration stage.

To DASHU: Well, India too can & should pass similar resolutions that in any case are not legally binding as they do not involve any executive policy decisions. After all, we are now living in an age of combative diplomacy. All such telephone conversations are recorded as per SOP.

To SANJEEV: Have uploaded additional slides & data that will answer much more than you have asked for.

To JAIKISHAN: 1) Yes. 2) The ‘desi’ SAR seeker for BrahMos-1 was tested last month. 3) BrahMos-1 is more expensive than Novator 3M54E Klub. 4) How can a hostile naval target located 500km away be detected, tracked, illuminated & locked-on by an IN warship armed with 500km-range BrahMos-1s? 5) Barak-ER was never meant for the IN, only for the IAF. 6) Both P-125A & P-15B DDGs are superior to the PLAN’s Type-052C/Type-052D DDGs in terms of network-centric warfare capabilities. 7) Why do you ASSUME that the AK-630M CIWS is useless? There is enough available space for mounting SR-SAM launchers of both types of DDGs. 8) Yes. 9) How can a radar used by corvettes also be mounted on DDGs & FFGs that have far more stronger & heavier main-masts? 10) The same. 12) After 2025. 11) Read this:

http://trishul-trident.blogspot.com/2019/08/indian-navy-places-bulk-order-for-sdrs.html

To RAD: Of what use is picking up targets at distances & altitudes that are not inside the volumetric airspace that needs to be controlled & monitored? Amogh-3 is nothing else but the SAMHO, which in turn is derived from the 120mm CLGM being developed for the Arjun Mk.1A MBT. Here it is:

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kQ-18-eXaKM/WKtcEymVXsI/AAAAAAAAMgc/_uXynvdau04SsCxK2TwDWOyFqrks-b4AQCLcB/s1600/SAHMO.jpg

The image you are referring to is the MPATGM, which will be series-produced by VEM Technologies, not by BDL. Here’s the MPATGM:

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-m6jD7M5zsjA/WKta--lz4MI/AAAAAAAAMgQ/_UAikc7t2xgjqSb7fpmMOMzOvqiP24gUACLcB/s1600/MPATGM.jpg

As for NG-ARM: do read this:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/india-tests-new-anti-radiation-missile-to-destroy-enemy-radars/articleshow/67676064.cms

Neither the K-15 nor the K-4/B-05 SLBM will go on board any of the 3 SSBNs, i.e. S-2/Arihant, S-3/Arighaat & S-4. SLBM operational deployment will begin with the S-5 SSBN. The BMD’s endo-atmospheric element makes use of the THALESRaytheon-supplied S-band Master-A engagement radar (only two procured), not the Ground Master.

shukant chatrath said...

sir the amphibious warfare capabilities of the PLAN with the inclusion of the Type-071 LPD and the Type-075 LHD has increased by 10 folds and yet the Indian Navy still dithers on with just one LPD the INS Jalashwa and a handful of the LST's.
What is the Indian Navy/ MoD planning to do to counter this???
also I have come to understand that the Navy will again release a tender for the multi role support vessel program, in your opinion when do you think this tender will be reopened or will it be reopened????

Anonymous said...

https://www.cnbctv18.com/views/afghanistans-request-for-indian-troops-its-an-insane-idea-which-new-delhi-must-take-seriously-5127611.htm

Interesting article sir bring in your expertise and provide a scenario which benefits both afghans and Indians

Ron

andy said...

hi prasun da, if k15 and k4 will not go onboard the ssbn's, then which missiles will arm them?

Senthil Kumar said...

Dear Prasun,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oq-bD4vT5Q

European Union Passes Resolution against CAA. Everyone is saying India's Image is damaged. Do you think India is in right track or digging its own grave.
Please comments.


Please see the link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4RsAFZULCM
Why BJP guys are going mad & arrogant.

How this BJP guys are talking even not respecting KC Singh who is well know & Reputed Ex Foreign official.

Regards
Senthil Kumar

Kapil said...

Lol who in the world gives a damn about European Parliament? We should worry about European parliament? Seriously? Is our standard so low? Btw EU has already denied that this is their stand. Strong and confident countries don't worry about such things. As for KC Singh, he lost his marbles long time back. Lastly a suggestion for you, stop watching fake news NDTV

Sujit said...

Prasun sir,
https://hushkit.net/2019/11/11/flying-fighting-the-dassault-rafale-interview-with-a-rafale-combat-veteran/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

As u hv said again nd again..low level penetration is the boss..no requirement of stealth ..so can we expect super sukhoi to have such low level penetrating capability like rafale?
2- u keep mentioning arihant class will not be fitted with neither k15 nor k4..so does that nean we still dont have nuclear triad?? All these capability are just proof of concept nd psy warfare by india??
3- u hv always maintained arihant class will be oparationalised as SSGN..do u think the speed of arihant class wud be enough? 24knots submerged speed..while the yasen class SSGN are hvng 35kn submerged speed?
4- mr. Saurav jha once said that the optimum submarine strength for indian navy wud be 36 ssk nd 10 ssn ..do u think it is feasible? Economic wise?
5-it seems navy is finally going for p75i..does that mean we will operate only 6 ssn?? Cauz as u said before that there wud be no money for operating different types of submarines.
6- dun know whether its true or not..but hearing rumours that iaf nd indian govt.are seriously paying attention to a proposal of 108 2nd hand mig 29 to be upgraded later..hv u heard anything like that?..nd do u think russia can supply all these airframes upgraded within 3 yrs?
7- colombia showing interest in tejas..ur view?

Parthasarathi said...

Dada,
As far as K9 is concerned what is army's experience ? Is there any repeat order on the card ?
Best regards

Hardik Thanki said...

Hello Prasunji,

Arihant class submarine at the moment are not armed with ballistic missiles. How good are they for conventional submarine roles and what are their sonar and anti ship and anti submarine capabilities.

Thanks & Regards

Hardik Thanki

Harsh said...

Sir, Any chance of additional K-9 vajra-t orders?? the deliveries will be completed by july & thereafter the 200 crore facility will lie waste.

If Pakistan has 300+ tracked howitzers, how we will do with only 82??

SUJOY MAJUMDAR said...

PrasunDa,

Iranian media is claiming that Michael D' Andrea, the CIA's point person for Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, allegedly responsible for Gen.QassemSolemani's assassination was killed in yesterday's plane crash in Ghazni.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200128-cia-chief-behind-soleimanis-assassination-killed-in-downed-plane-in-afghanistan/

If this news is true it showcases a tremendous level of counter intelligence and execution on the part of Iran.

Ashish Gautam said...

https://twitter.com/HALHQBLR/status/1222751431649681408?s=19
Well cockpit seems fine, just a copy of su35 cockpit... But 1 question, why aren't they using wide HUD like that used on Rafale, su57 etc?? MAWS is already in list of upgrades .. how about jammers? Israeli or Indian or russian?

AMIT BISWAS said...

Sir ji where are u...no whereabouts...are u okk??

Jaikishan said...

Thanks for previous replies sir,

1) What is the rough unit cost of a ship launched brahmos ASCM and a klub ASCM respectively?

2) Apart from cost, what other differences are there between klub and brahmos ASCMs?
I know the Brahmos has a higher range at 290km vs klubs 220km (export version), but what other advantages or disadvantages are there in terms of Seeker or electronics etc etc?

3) Between the MF STAR radar on the p15a and the MAARS radar on the type 052d, which is better radar and by how much?

4) When will the first full 500km range brahmos be inducted into the military (among any of the three services) and on what platform?

5) What is the rough estimated range for Hull mounted sonars like humsa NG to detect modern torpedoes approaching them?

6) I know the missile load out of the type 052d destroyer varies according to mission, but what (if any) is the standard or most common load out for the 64 VLS cells on the type 052d? You had mentioned that Chinese destroyers usually deploy 16 ASCMs, so what will constitute the remaining 48 cells?

7) Until the cooperative Barak 8 firing last May, the barak 8 was called LRSAM, but after that firing it is being called MRSAM (both on Indian navy website and pib). What explains this change in nomenclature?

8) What is the main long range SAM being carried on the type 052d and type 055 destroyers? Is it the HHQ9A or HHQ9B? What is the maximum range of that missile?


9) Can't india look at buying second hand warships like the recently retired oliver hazard frigates or soon to be retired type 23 from Royal navy to bolster our fleet numbers?

VIKRAM GUHA said...

PrasunDa,

Defence budget increase by just 5.8%. So low that Defence Ministry is saying that they cannot complete major procurement and is asking Finance Ministry to levy special cess to meet capital expenditure.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/levy-special-cess-to-meet-capital-expenditure-defence-ministry-recommends-to-finance-commission/articleshow/73837607.cms?utm_source=twitter_pwa&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialsharebuttons&from=mdr

Why such a marginal rise in defence budget? Especially capital expenditure for Navy has taken a severe beating. Procurement of MH-60, SR-SAM, P-75I will take a massive beating.

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/

Please share your view.

Many thanks

youngbengal said...

@AMIT BISWAS-The principle and working mechanism of RADAR rotation is not as simple as that of ceiling fan where rotating parts only made to rotate on change of magnetic field and doesn't require to send back any signal or feed back to static part. Though its difficult to explain without diagram let me explain. Its called coloumn type slip ring assembly where rotating part is a cylindrical tube with multiple rings spaced with insulator between two successive rings and placed along the length. These rings are actually contacts points. This rotating cylindrical part with ring is housed inside a fixed cylindrical tube with leaf spring type contacts with small roller fitted at the end of each leaf and spaced according to the slip ring contacts of the inner cylinder. while rotating, these rings always in contacts with their corresponding leaves. It is of course primitive design which has been replaced with a rotary encoder which works in conjunction with optical fibers

Rajesh Mishra said...

You are seriously busy. the war must be imminent.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To RAJESH MISHRA: Actually, I was busy the moment Pakistan began crying out aloud 3 weeks ago about an impending ‘false-flag’ operation being staged by India inside J & K. In reality, what this meant was that Pakistan was so confident about a terror incident taking place inside J & K that it was willing to predict with certainty that such an incident will take place & that too within a short timeframe. So, the only available countermeasure for India was to forestall this plot. Consequently, an excellent inytelligence-driven operation was launched, which culminated in the 3 Pakuistani JeM terrorists being gunned down at a toll plaza in Nagrota near Jammu on January 31, 2020. They are had infiltrated from across the International Border (part of the 198km-long Working Boundary guarded by the BSF in Poonch/Jammu areas adjacent to Pakistan) in Dayalachak area of Hiranagar sector in Kathua district. They infiltrated on Thursday evening, were picked up by a Kashmir-bound truck (JK03F/1478) and reached Ban toll plaza on Friday morning. They were hiding in a cavity in the truck. Dayalachak is around 62km from Jammu and Ban toll plaza is around 25km from Jammu city. Therefore, the terrorists travelled 86km on Pathankot-Jammu-Srinagar highway before being intercepted at the toll plaza. The reason the WB is now the favoured infiltration area of entry is that more than 13 rivers and seasonal rivulets like Basanter River, Devak River and Tarnah River, Shaap Nullah in Samba-Kathua sector, Aik Nullah, Nikki and Baddi Tawi in RS Pura sector of Jammu district and Chenab River in Pargwal sector and Munawar Tawi in Akhnoor sub-division of Jammu district flow into Pakistan from the WB. These riverine gaps are among the traditional routes used by terrorists to infiltrate into India & that’s precisely why JeM’s HQ in Bahawalpur has dedicated infrastructure for imparting training on riverine infiltration (and not seaborne infiltration as mistakenly assumed by several ‘desi patrakaars’ in the past). In the Jhajjar Kotli attack on September 12, 2018, three JeM terrorists had adopted a similar modus operandi before they were killed in a day-long encounter. Similarly, three JeM terrorists were arrested from another Kashmir-bound truck with arms and ammo at Lakhanpur in Kathua district on September 12, 2019. That truck, with registration number JK13E-2000, was owned by Suhil Ahmed Latoo of Gulshanabad of Pulwama. Here are some good, informative videoclips of the latest incident:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O99aRfquBg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2Kjy7SS1MA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2t8QSUYaqM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWJ44vWKckg

2 Youths Planning To Cross LoC Handed Back To Their Parents:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUGJTKDV8ac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flmvEFu0q2E

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To ASHISH GAUTAM: Nothing new at all about the Super Su-30MKI front cockpit from HAL. In fact, they were all shown at Aero India 2017, albeit at the booth of DRDO’s DARE & here aretheir photos:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xOQ5HpmCq-I/WKWQNNeACOI/AAAAAAAAMac/A-F3kt9CCrsBeCgPypl75R1JKPhqk1opwCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2Bfront%2Bcockpit%2Bdisplays%2Bfor%2BSuper%2BSu-30MKI.JPG

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-uwDtv9_wHGQ/WKWQkGGry0I/AAAAAAAAMag/a82En_Y7at8jVw6UdqpXGW9vb2mHvt-YwCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2Brear%2Bcockpit%2Bdisplays%2Bfor%2BSuper%2BSu-30MKI.JPG

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tiHLV7Uob_4/WKMXpYMKC2I/AAAAAAAAMXo/TRadnQxstk093RZlCg-poOmMH_QMtOAxgCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2BEW%2BPod.jpg

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xLScRL4HbMw/WKMYIn4SGaI/AAAAAAAAMXs/qiT1LNIECp8K0xcPRSaKx4Ka5Uoqsw09QCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2BInternal%2BASPJ.jpg

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MJIG7Qg9ey4/WKMYPLN2BfI/AAAAAAAAMXw/kw6X-eQAFvE-jCWd7aqijWk-QtYs7qlCwCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2BMAWS%2Barchitecture%2Bfor%2BSuper%2BSu-30MKI.jpg

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hJ2Ik-p64u8/WKWROetoMlI/AAAAAAAAMao/lXbN_GGvx1EcgCzKM08DP53ZtTCVhfUJgCLcB/s1600/DARE-developed%2Binternal%2BASPJ%2Bfor%2BJaguar%2BIS%2BDARIN-3.jpg

Since the Su-30MKI has a two-man cockpit & the WSO at the rear has his own dedicated AMLCD panels for looking at target designation & guidance imagery, a holographic HUD isn’t reqd. For in single-seat cockpits where there’s no space for housing large AMLCD panels, hpolographic HUDs are used for superimposition of both flight management & weapons targeting/guidance symbology & imagery.

To ANDY & SUJIT: Here are the 2 sources of info:

https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PMO=3&PRID=1551894

Nov 5, 2018: India’s pride, nuclear submarine INS Arihant successfully completed its first deterrence patrol! In an era such as this, a credible nuclear deterrence is the need of the hour. The success of INS Arihant gives a fitting response to those who indulge in nuclear blackmail

Missing from these is the term ‘ballistic missile’. That’s because no ballistic missile has ever been fired from any IN-operated submarine as yet. Nor has the K-15 SLBM been showcased in any Republic Day Parade. In fact, the video mistakenly claimed by many to be a K-15 SLBM test-firing is in fact that of a P-70 Ametist ASCM being fired from a Project 670 SKAT (Charlie-1) SSGN back in the late 1980s & that’s what is responsible for the smoke emanating from the two side-mounted booster rockets.

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To VIKRAM GUHA: Here are the figures: The allocation for defence pension has shot up by a significant 13.6% to Rs.1.33 lakh crore in the Union Budget 2020-21, even though the overall capital budget allocation for the armed forces has seen a marginal increase of just 3%, or Rs.3,400 crore. The total defence budget this financial year, including pensions, stands at Rs.4.71 lakh crore. Excluding pensions, the defence budget has just increased by 1.82%. The capital outlay for the Army has increased 10.3%, while that for the Navy has risen 2%. The outlay for the Indian Air Force, meanwhile, has decreased by 2.3%. Defence pensions, including those for civil employees of the MoD, are higher than the pay and allowances for the services, which stand at Rs.1.17 lakh crore. Pensions constitute 28% of the overall expenditure of the MoD, even higher than the Rs.1.13 lakh crore earmarked for new acquisitions and modernisation of the armed forces. The Army is the most manpower-intensive service of the three with a strength of 13 lakh personnel, and the pension allocation for it is Rs.1.13 lakh crore. For the Indian Air Force and the Navy, the figures stand at Rs.0.13 lakh crore and Rs.0.072 lakh crore, respectively. Budget documents show that the increase in defence pension is largely because of an increase in pensioners and an impact of dearness relief. While Sitharaman had allocated Rs.39,302.64 crore for the IAF capital expenditure in her last budget in July 2019, it was increased to Rs.44,869.14 crore in the revised estimates for 2019-20. Sitharaman allocated Rs.43,281.91 crore for 2020-21—a 3.5% decrease from the revised estimates. The move came despite the fact that the IAF’s committed liabilities—payments to be made for past orders—was around the same figure as the revised estimates. While the revised estimates for the Army was at Rs.29,666.90 crore this fiscal, the budgetary estimates for the next fiscal has been increased by 8.4% to Rs.32,392.38 crore. The Navy, which has been reeling under severe fund crunch, also saw a minor increase—the budget allocation for 2020-21 stood at Rs.26,688.28, a 2% rise from the revised estimates of Rs.26,156.43 crore.

https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sbe18.pdf
https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sbe19.pdf
https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sbe20.pdf
https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sbe21.pdf

Cont'd below...

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

Clearly, the writing on the wall says that finally, the time has come adopt common-sensical measures, such as the following:

1) The IN should get rid of the IL-38SD MRMR/ASW platforms ASAP & standardise on the P-8Is, with 24 being acquired. The ICGS too should go for a variant of the P-8I for EEZ surveillance/patrolling but being armed with 20mm gunpods, not AGM-84L Harpoon ASCMs.

2) Give up all dreams about procuring C-295 MRMR/ASW/MPA platforms. P-8Is are enough to get the job done. Similarly, invest in SeaGuardian MALE-UAVs to do reconnaissance/surveillance sorties that are dull, dry, dirty & dangerous in nature.

3) IA should be made to own & operate all AH-64E Apache attack helicopters. It is unaffordable for both the IA & IAF to operate separate AH-64E fleets with all their duplicated flying training & ground-support infrastructure. The IA should build its own dedicated heli-bases in both Jammu & Poonch, plus in Leh, instead of keeping the Apaches & Rudras & LCHs farther away in Pathankot.

4) HAL should stop all work on developing a 12-tonne NMRH & should instead begin developing ASAP a 7.5-tonne version of the Dhruv ALH to serve as the NUH as well as CASEVAC helicopter for the IA & a CSAR platform for the IAF.

5) Expedite the airworthiness certification of weaponised versions of both the LCH & LUH. Only this then will enable the MoD to stop procuring the Ka-226Ts.

6) The IAF now has a clear choice to make: either accept the Tejas Mk.1A without internal cannon or select an imported MRFA with internal cannon. The choice here should be obvious.

7) Stop forthwith the discredited practice of licence-building imported weapons platforms at 2.5 times the cost of importing them off-the-shelf. GSL should be stopped from making only 2 Project 1135.6 FFGs & the money saved should instead be spent on building 10 MCMVs of Russian design, with Russia supplying only two more off-the-shelf.

8) Disinvest in all DPSUs, especially in the OFB & make them financially independent & their managements should no longer be anbswerable to the MoD’s dept of Defence Production.

9) Discourage the practice of creating duplication of military-industrial infrastructure in the name of competition between private-sector & public-sector. In no other country in the world are there production facilities competing for producing the same type of principal weapons platforms. If public-sector or state-owned production plants in Russia are good enough for supplyiong weapons to India, then why can’t Indian public-sector facilities replicate such feats?

10) Disband the IA’s HQ Southern Command & re-disitribute its ORBAT among the IA’s Western & Central Commands.

11) Forget about procuring additional SSKs under P-75I & instead procure no less than six 5,500-tonne SSGNs like the INS Arihant S-73. If rerqd, procure just an additional 3 CM-2000 Scorpene SSKs but fitted with MAREEM AIP module.

12) Create a National Joint Forces Wargaming Simulation Centre that will be embedded within the joint services National Defence University (NDU). And where the hell is the NDU, whose creation was decided upon way back early this decade?

13) Don’t invest even a single Paisa on fanciful ventures like the TED-BF.

14) Stop issuing fresh RFPs about the MRSV/LPH vessel reqmt & instead focus on CSL teaming up with Navantia for converting the IAC-1’s design into a MRSV platform with 80% systems commonality. In addition, since the 24 Sikorsky MH-60Rs are to be procured, all the IN’s existing 17 Sea King Mk.42Bs & four Sikorsky SH-3Ds should be re-engined, upgraded (with glass cockpit avionics of the type on the ‘Rudra’ ALH & modified (instead of being decommissioned) into utility helicopters capable of operating from MRSV/LPH.

DAshu said...

Not a single point will be considered out of your 14, I am confident about it, which is depressing.

Kaustav said...

Prasunda,

I believe that's touted to be the recorded video of first test-firing of the K-4 where smoke from side boosters are seen. The K-15 launch video has no such smoke coming from side boosters, missile is visible & the cap is thrown off after it emerges from water. The K-15 video is officially acknowledged as launch from a pontoon. There has been no record, official release about K-4 launch.

As you have said, the K-15 is the only missile that can be launched from the Arihant class. But it would certainly be more useful & exactly the role the IN intended for it to be used as a SSGN hopefully armed with 12 VL Brahmos. I do hope you thus suggest for the IN to have 9 (3+6) Arihant class SSGN which Alon with the 6 proposed SSN will give IN the much needed underwater punch. A total of 9-12 (Scorpenes) SSKs should be more than enough as Russian Kilo & German HDWs are progressively retired. That the HDW lessons were lost is a tragedy but water under the bridge now. Hope, the story with the Scorpenes is different. But the IN should go in for various Nuclear Submarines as this seems to be most logical & feasible.

The budget is a disaster, but shows the future. Defence Pension has to be separated from the Defence Budget & put under Welfare. More Boeing P8Is are required both for IN & CG for patrolling & monitoring Indian interests. Combat aircraft such as Su30MKI & maybe Tejas in future optimised for maritime strike should provide additional sea denial capabilities & support to Maritime Reconnaissance Aircraft

Sujit said...

Prasun sir,
1-i could not understand with regards to the choice of choosing tejas mk1A without internal gun or a new mrfa with internal gun ..what is obvious??? U said it before also that iaf wud not gonna go for any aircraft minus internal gun..
2-ins arihant is nearly 6000 ton with hump for vertical silos.. As u said ssn without hump is better than ssgn so isn't it wud be a good idea to increase the 6ssn order to 12, Instead of another 6arihant ssgn??. Noise wise ssn wud be silent than ssgn and moreover arihant speed is also low as compared to ssgn like yasen class or Virginia class..

Rajesh Mishra said...

I think all the possible points as presented by you will be considered. I feel the times are changing in your favor.

VIKRAM GUHA said...

PrasunDa,

Great suggestions. I hope the powers that be who visit your blog will go through these great insights that you have provided.

1. The budget for the Navy is so little that all major procurement will take a beating. Already India has lost the submarine race to China. Now India is on the verge of losing the anti submarine race to China as well.

Similarly MoD has not even completed discussions for the procurement of the much needed 57 fighter aircraft for the Navy, leave alone purchasing them. SR-SAM is another major area.

Tremendous amount of problem w.r.t procurement. Procurement even under the current regime is as slow as it was under UPA.

2. Pravin Sawhney tweeted about the defence budget saying - " Analysts disappointment with defence budget should know gov priorities under Gen Rawat: (a)Limited response strategy for Pak - another name for CT ops (b) indigenisation. War preparedness is long term objective, not a priority."

Please provide your views.

Thank You

VIKRAM GUHA said...

PrasunDa,

You wrote that Cochin Shipyard can tie up with Navantia to derive a MRSV out of the IAC-1 design. However, in the recent past, for the MRSV tender it was L&T that had tied up with Navantia.

Will Navantia be allowed to change partners assuming Cochin is allowed to do what you suggested/

Thanks

Prasun K. Sengupta said...

To KAUSTAV: here are the 2 videoclips showing the P-70 & K-15 firings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at5POvTkyb4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o32rth2bH8

And some data on the P-70 ASCM: https://weaponsystems.net/system/563-P-70+Ametist

And almost every week nowadays the US seems to be exposing Chinese espionage rings, with this being the latest:

https://qz.com/1795127/raytheon-engineer-arrested-for-taking-us-missile-defense-secrets-to-china/

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6747449/Sun-Complaint.pdf

And this really leads one to question whether such a country can really master nuclear WMD-related theoretical/experimental physics:

https://www.dawn.com/news/1531778

To SUJIT: If the IAF decides to go for Tejas Mk.1 & Tejas Mk.1A minus cannons, then it will be the world’s only air force to operate 4+-Gen MRCAs without cannons. Hence, it is imperative that gun-pods be acquired for both types of MRCAs. Here are some 20mm, 25mm & 30mm option:

https://www.konflikty.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/IMG_0008-e1409857586600.jpg

https://the-drive-2.imgix.net/http%3A%2F%2Fd254andzyoxz3f.cloudfront.net%2F1341327745874964582.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&ixlib=js-1.4.1&s=de4aa6d82c2b7d9f1dc3bf6f475efb5f

http://www.zvi.cz/en/products/20-mm-gun-pod-plamen.html

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMw2s8QWEAArhfR.jpg

The Arihant presently can accommodate the larger & heavier BrahMos-1s, but a better option will be torpedo-tube-launched BrahMos-NGs.

To ANUP: 1) Not quite, if the IAF quickly selects the optimum gun-pod for both Tejas Mk.1 & Mk.1A. But the downside will be the loss of the centreline belly-located pylon station for accommodating the gun-pod, instead of the supersonic fuel drop-tank. 3) Need of the hour is platform fleet standardisation so that fleet-level direct operating costs & related life-cycle costs come down drastically.

To VIKRAM GUHA: 1) VMT, but in my view, the IN fully deserves it, since it has been following for the past 25 years the discredited practice of launching a warship that is only 33% completed during its launch-time. The rest of the work requiring completion takes even more than a decade to fructify simply because the warship’s design never gests frozen & imported sub-systems & weapons get selected & ordered in a piecemeal manner. All this only jacks up the cost of building each warship to prohibitive levels. 2) War preparedness for a limited-to-LoC high-intensity limited war lasting not more than 10 days is possible & achievable till 2022. Beyond 2022 the scenario remains undefined as far as two-front wargaming scenarios go. But fortunately, the adversary too is ill-equipped, as assessed in this report:

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/khaled-ahmed-pakistan-military-us-india-relations-6244973/

And here is the site where DEFEXPO-2020 will be staged: Vrindavan Yojna, Sector 15, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Location: 26 45 13.12 N, 80 57 9.85 E (check it up on GoogleEarth)

rad said...

hi prasun

the ew equipment posted above are going on the super su30?

you did mention that some of them cannot go on voard due to space shortage

are the above systems comparab;e to any degree to the state of the art stuff by israel? especially the jammer pod .

will russia allow us to tinker around with the super su-30 as they allowed us to a certain degree on teh basic-su-30? like integration of the SFDR aam missile , NGARM, in future?.

Is samtel making the big displys for the super su-30? how are the modern SFDR going to integrate for data linking on the super su30. will russia certify the desi ew equipment ?
iw MAWS ,RWR, ASPJ etc?

how do you rate the wing tip jammers of teh russian designed jammers , i hear they shut down a US navy aegis radar?

dont you think US and other would have recorded the k-4 launch real time
/ why does the GOI then not relase pics of it?

you will coverthe defexpo ?

you mentined more US chinese spying for mother land . inspite of all this why do they employ chines knowing the risk?
i see all new discoveries in US universities are hogged by chinese > are they more brainier or what?
are they taiwnese od mainland?













Ashish Gautam said...

https://twitter.com/DefExpoIndia/status/1224266408311148547?s=19
Sir robotics and AI vale ka winner mai hu, @ayush_gtm
Apka dia hua knowledge bhi incorporate kia tha twitter thread mei.
6 Feb ko apse milna ho skta hai vaha?

Anonymous said...

Why don’t Govt introduce NPS for military personnel too ?


Regards
Venky

Ashish Gautam said...

Link to my that thread for which i have been declared winner for topic "role of AI & robotics in defence".
There are 11 tweets in it, all are numbered.
https://twitter.com/ayush_gtm/status/1221674740286230529?s=19
Prasun sir, again thanks a lot, apke diye hue kafi knowledge ko likha hai usme...
I know its not sufficient, baht kuch reh gaya to mention but fir bhi i tried a bit.
Thanks

Unknown said...

PrasunDa,

We have MK1A, MWF, TEDFJ, AMCA, GATAK In Fighter category. There is nothing for logistics.

Your comment on Electric Transport aircraft.

"Wright Electric, the company that dreams about electrification of aircrafts, announced the start of the electric propulsion development program for the 186-seat electric aircraft - Wright 1."

https://insideevs.com/news/396560/wright-electric-1-5-mw-motor-aircraft/

just_curious said...

Prasun,

- what's with the news of islamist congregating in nepal and mushrooming mosques along india border run by radicals..who and why in nepal are turning a bling eye to it...
- Srilanks cancelling the singing of national anthem in tamil ..another amongst the list of many acts to treat tamils as 2nd class citizens.... is the rajyapaksa govt again going to create tamil discontent
- why is the modi govt voicing concerns abt bangladesh loudly .. isnt that creating a rift in a seemingly cordial realtions with bangladesh?
- on tejas mk1 a.. why cannot they be inducted w/o a gun which can be added on later after all look at Jf 17 .. a junk in blk 1 but has progressively evolved.. same with f 35 which has a host of issues including its guns no being accurate.. su 30 mki, mig 29k was also inducted with teething troubles
http://www.indiandefensenews.in/2020/02/f-35s-gun-that-cant-shoot-straight-adds.html
- ur reply on IN begin foolish on its decision to not freeze spec.. why is anybody not highlighting it or taking corrective action.. vested interests who benefit from orice rise?
- ur assesment of Skorea's offer for p 75i -- kss3 sub
- your 14 pointer is excellent .. on the point no 6 is it an either/or case between mk1 a & MRFA.. Thought you had mentioned previously that funds are available for all future projects being lined up including these 2.. the rest being super sukhi, additional rafales, tejas MWF .. .. I'm not including AMCA as you have highlighted your reservations on its feasibility earlier
- Your point on C295 , if they are not needed why is the MoD even encouraging discussions around it .. EU pressure? they can always involve airbus as tech consultants for AMCA or MWF